Political Legal And Lifestyle Forum

[kathyarten]

Weapons of Mass Destruction have three major components; nuclear, biological, and chemical. One of the things that these three components share is the ability to create mass destruction from one release.

Just ask the Kurds, Saddam tried to exterminate them with chemical agents. Fast forward to post invasion Iraq.

A combined Associated Press and Fox News report released on May 17, 2004, mentioned a sarin nerve gas discovery. Troops handling the shells that contained this gas ended up getting treated for chemical exposure. The Iraq Survey Group confirmed this sarin gas. Mustard gas was also discovered.

As chemical agents, sarin and mustard gas are WMD. Whether it was pre 1991, or current, is beside the point.

People that insist that President Bush lied about WMD existence argue that Iraq had no WMD. No WMD means zero WMD, regardless of manufacture date.

Even if they try to argue that these WMD predate 1991, they prove their own, "no WMD," argument wrong. By trying to argue that this WMD was old, they destroy their own argument that President Bush "lied" about Iraq WMD existence.

Source http://www.resourcesforattorneys.com/issues/index.php?entry=entry090109-175611
_________________
Karthy Arten
Los Angeles County Lawyers

[bloging]

Come on now... post invasion they found NO WMD. If the best you can do is sarin and mustard gas from 1991, your argument is weak at best. Bush is a liar and the entire war was a platform to line his own greedy pockets. It will all come out one day. Where there is that much smoke... there's fire!

[tonygarner]

question blogging, how did President Bush line his own greedy pockets? Do you have any facts to show that he made money from the war in Iraq?
_________________
Tony Garner
Los Angeles County Realtors